The document provides the guidelines for submitting changes to DPDK EthDev TS.
If you want your changes to be accepted in the mainline:
- The code must comply with the project's coding style.
- The code must meet the license requirements.
- A changeset summary and body must comply with requirements for it.
- Each changeset must be testable and tested.
- All changes must pass maintainers' review and be accepted by the maintainer.
Submission is done using pull requests.
Coding style for C, Shell and Python is defined in the separate Git repository StyleGuides.
Meson build system control files (meson.build
and
meson_options.txt
) should:
- use lower case and underscore for words separation
- use 4 spaces to indent
- have no space after opening and before closing parentheses
- have spaces after opening and before closing square brackets
- follow the style of a corresponding file
All new code must be licensed under Apache 2.0.
All new files must have SPDX-License-Identifier in the first (e.g. C, Meson) or the second line (e.g. Shell, Python and other shebang executables, XML, YAML).
The next line after the SPDX tag should contain a copyright notice. It could be non Xilinx, Inc copyright (e.g. your employer copyright).
The summary line should:
-
highlight the scope and the impact of the change
-
be up to 60 characters
-
be lowercase apart from acronyms and proper names
-
be prefixed with the component name, for example:
ts
conf
(for generic changes in configuration files)doc
scripts
usecases|perf|xmit|...
(for changes related to a specific package)usecases/rss
(for changes related to a specific test)- Note: changes to TRC, package.xml and other similar files should be attributed to the relevant package/test
-
start with the imperative of a verb, for example:
xmit/vlan_txqs_interference: let packets re-order on Tx
ts: switch to newer port-related items and actions
-
be human-readable and contain no file and symbol names from the sources
The commit message body should consist of several sections in the order specified below.
Note that there should be no empty lines in trailer sections and between them.
The body of the message must reply to the question why the change is necessary. Even when a new feature is added, it must shed light on why the feature is necessary/useful. If you fix a build warning, don't forget to provide compiler version and other environment details.
The description may be absent if the summary line already does the job.
If the change is tricky, the description may provide explanations which are not suitable for the code.
The text of the description should wrap at 72 characters.
If the patch fixes an issue introduced by an earlier changeset, it should
have Fixes:
trailer which must be formatted using:
git config alias.fixline "log -1 --abbrev=12 --format='Fixes: %h (\"%s\")'" # once
git fixline <SHA>
Helper trailers may contain references to an internal issue tracker (e.g. Bugzilla, Redmine or Jira) which is not accessible outside. The patch author is fully responsible for correctness of the reference. For example:
AMD-Jira-Id: DPDK-12345
Reviewers may ask to add their references to issue tracker.
References to internal code review systems may be added in a similar way.
Patch authors are encouraged to add the following trailers, if applicable,
to give credit to people who find and report bugs (Reported-by:
),
suggest a main idea/design implemented in the patch (Suggested-by:
) or
take part in the development (Co-developed-by:
). Every co-developer
trailer must be immediately followed by a Signed-off-by:
of the associated
co-author (see below).
The commit message must have a Signed-off-by:
line which is added using:
git commit --signoff # or -s
The purpose of the signoff is explained in the Developer’s Certificate of Origin section of the Linux kernel guidelines. Ensure that you have read and fully understood it prior to applying the signoff.
Review trailers (Reviewed-by:
, Acked-by:
and Tested-by:
) are based on
a review process which may take place internally using company services or
publicly on GitHub.
In case of an internal review it is the pull request submitter who is responsible to add review trailers based on internal review feedback.
In case of a public review either the submitter or the accepting maintainer should add applicable review trailers.
Acked-by:
means that the reviewer acknowledges the overall idea/design of
the patch, but has not reviewed the code in details.
Reviewed-by:
means that the reviewer has inspected the code in details in
addition to overall design approval.
Tested-by:
means that the reviewer has tried the changeset or entire patch
series, checked that it does the job and found no regressions.
component: fix segmentation fault on invalid input
Input parameters were not validated and it resulted in segmentation
fault which eats extra time on debugging. Add error logging to make
debugging easier.
Fixes: afaada7087af ("Import the first public release")
AMD-Jira-Id: DPDK-1234
Signed-off-by: John Doe <johnd@example.com>
Reviewed-by: Jane Doe <janed@example.com>