You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The font Library currently displays font weights using their numeric values, for example "Open Sans 400 Normal", "Open Sans 400 Italic".
These font weights are unintuitive for people who do not work on the web on a daily basis. The regular site owner is likely to be unaware that 400 Normal means the standard font weight.
Given most developers define font weight via the keywords, it's probably fair to assume that the numbers are unintuitive for a good number of web developers too. (I know it takes me a little thought to remember 400 is normal.)
What is your proposed solution?
Rather than display the numeric weight value, I suggest using the common name mappings sourced from MDN:
Value
Common weight name
100
Thin (Hairline)
200
Extra Light (Ultra Light)
300
Light
400
Normal (Regular)
500
Medium
600
Semi Bold (Demi Bold)
700
Bold
800
Extra Bold (Ultra Bold)
900
Black (Heavy)
950
Extra Black (Ultra Black)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
can you assign it to me?This is my first contribution can you tell me what is the name of the file or where can i get this file so that i can edit this issue.
What problem does this address?
The font Library currently displays font weights using their numeric values, for example "Open Sans 400 Normal", "Open Sans 400 Italic".
These font weights are unintuitive for people who do not work on the web on a daily basis. The regular site owner is likely to be unaware that
400 Normal
means the standard font weight.Given most developers define font weight via the keywords, it's probably fair to assume that the numbers are unintuitive for a good number of web developers too. (I know it takes me a little thought to remember 400 is normal.)
What is your proposed solution?
Rather than display the numeric weight value, I suggest using the common name mappings sourced from MDN:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: