Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency in where Inserter adds a block #1696

Closed
hedgefield opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Inconsistency in where Inserter adds a block #1696

hedgefield opened this issue Jul 4, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
[Feature] Inserter The main way to insert blocks using the + button in the editing interface

Comments

@hedgefield
Copy link

hedgefield commented Jul 4, 2017

I noticed that if you pick one of the shortcuts that appear when you hover over the inserter, those blocks get added below the existing content.

screen_shot_2017-07-04_at_13_08_08

But if you pick one from the actual inserter menu, it appears below the block you have selected.

screen_shot_2017-07-04_at_13_08_15

The first method is the most intuitive, but in lieu of an inserter appearing between blocks I prefer the second method. What should we do about this?

Version 0.3.0

@swissspidy swissspidy added the [Feature] Inserter The main way to insert blocks using the + button in the editing interface label Jul 4, 2017
@karmatosed karmatosed changed the title 0.3.0: inconsistency in where Inserter adds a block Inconsistency in where Inserter adds a block: version 0.3.0 Jul 4, 2017
@karmatosed karmatosed changed the title Inconsistency in where Inserter adds a block: version 0.3.0 Inconsistency in where Inserter adds a block Jul 4, 2017
@mtias
Copy link
Member

mtias commented Nov 20, 2017

Going to close as we do have an inserter showing in-between blocks now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Feature] Inserter The main way to insert blocks using the + button in the editing interface
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants