You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't revisited the spec in a few months and saw that #471 and #475 have landed. However, browsing the spec I see no mention of binary or quoted module definitions for the text format. I saw the comments like #471 (comment) saying move forward without the binary for now, but it is built in to the spec tests, so implementers must implement it or not pass. As for the quote part, I didn't see that anywhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The wast test format is a superset of the official text format. There is no expectation that other tool chains understand it, and the quote and binary syntax (as well as the other extensions) really only seem useful for testing consumers. But you should be able use the reference interpreter or wabt to convert it to bare wat.
I haven't revisited the spec in a few months and saw that #471 and #475 have landed. However, browsing the spec I see no mention of binary or quoted module definitions for the text format. I saw the comments like #471 (comment) saying move forward without the binary for now, but it is built in to the spec tests, so implementers must implement it or not pass. As for the quote part, I didn't see that anywhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: