Skip to content
arielf edited this page Jul 24, 2012 · 52 revisions

Given a prediction (p) and a label (y), a loss function (\ell(p,y)) measures the discrepancy between the algorithm's prediction and the desired output. VW currently supports the following loss functions:

  1. Squared loss [\ell(p,y)=\frac{1}{2}(p-y)^2]
  2. Logistic loss [\ell(p,y)=\log(1+\exp(-yp))]
  3. Hinge loss [\ell(p,y)=\max(0,1-yp)]
  4. (\tau)-Quantile loss [\ell(p,y)=\tau(p-y)\mathbb{I}(y \le p) +(1-\tau)(y-p)\mathbb{I}(y \geq p) ]

To select a loss function in VW see the Command line arguments guide. The Logistic and Hinge loss are for binary classification only, and thus all samples must have class "-1" or "1".

Which loss function should I use?

  • If the problem is a binary classification problem your choices should be Logistic or hinge loss. Example: spam vs non-spam, odds of click vs no-click. (Q: when should hinge-loss be used vs logistic?)
  • If the problem is a regression problem, meaning the target label you're trying to predict is a real value -- you should be using Squared or Quantile loss. Example: revenue, height, weight. If you're trying to minimize the mean error, use squared-loss. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_squares . If OTOH you're trying to predict rank/order and you don't mind the mean error to increase as long as you get the relative order correct, you need to minimize the error vs the median (or any other quantile), in this case, you should use quantile-loss. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantile_regression
Clone this wiki locally