Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K and Modified K index #631

Open
jrleeman opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

K and Modified K index #631

jrleeman opened this issue Nov 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
Area: Calc Pertains to calculations GEMPAK Conversion Needed to replicate GEMPAK functionality Status: On Hold Another issue needs resolution for this issue to proceed

Comments

@jrleeman
Copy link
Contributor

Parameter used to indicate the potential of air mass thunderstorms.

From COD (http://weather.cod.edu/sirvatka/si.html)

K-Index

K = (T850 - T500) + Td850 - (T700 - Td700)
The K index is a poor indicator of severe thunderstorms since dry air at 700 mb may indicate convective instability. Dry air at 700 mb will give a low value to the K-Index.

K values +20 indicate some potential for air mass thunderstorms.
K values +40 indicate almost 100% chance for air mass thunderstorms,
with values over +30 to indicate potential MCC's.

Modified K-Index

Similar to that of the K-Index except that instead of the T and Td at 850 mb, the average temperature and dew point between 850 mb and the surface are used.

@jrleeman jrleeman added Area: Calc Pertains to calculations GEMPAK Conversion Needed to replicate GEMPAK functionality labels Nov 30, 2017
@dopplershift dopplershift added Status: On Hold Another issue needs resolution for this issue to proceed and removed Status: Waiting labels Mar 9, 2018
@dopplershift
Copy link
Member

Still need modified k-index.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Calc Pertains to calculations GEMPAK Conversion Needed to replicate GEMPAK functionality Status: On Hold Another issue needs resolution for this issue to proceed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants