-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
wi_beta_per_county.Rmd
287 lines (247 loc) · 9.33 KB
/
wi_beta_per_county.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
---
title: "Adjusted positivity"
author: "`r paste('Brian Yandell,', format(Sys.time(), '%d %B %Y'))`"
output: html_document
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE, message = FALSE, warning = FALSE)
```
```{r}
library(tidyverse)
library(readxl)
kprint <- function(x) {
if(interactive()) {
print(x)
} else {
knitr::kable(x)
}
}
library(httr)
library(jsonlite)
library(data.table)
library(simpleboot)
```
This work is a collaboration of Brian Yandell, Dorte Dopfer and Juan Francisco Mandujano Reyes.
### Wisconsin Historical Testing Data by County
This was an earlier attempt in which we did not have age-specific information by county. Instead, we used the overall data and attempted to adjust based on age distribution in state from Census. This has code for pulling data from JSON API. See instead file `wi_beta_new_data.Rmd`.
The data are published daily at <https://data.dhsgis.wi.gov/datasets/covid-19-historical-data-table/data>.
There is manual download of CSV or automated API access. The first part of the code translates the JSON file from API to a data frame. For the whole state and each county, we get total positive and negative tests. For the state, we get the number of positives by 10-year age groups, but not the number of negative by age group.
```{r}
jsonResponse <- GET("https://opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/b913e9591eae4912b33dc5b4e88646c5_10.geojson")
jsonResponseText <- content(jsonResponse, as = "text")
dataJSON <- fromJSON(jsonResponseText)
data_WI <- dataJSON$features
data_WI <- do.call("rbind", data_WI)
data_WI <- as.data.frame(data_WI)
```
```{r}
wiHist <- data_WI %>%
filter(GEO == "State") %>%
select(DATE, NEGATIVE, POSITIVE, POS_0_9:POS_90) %>%
mutate(DATE = as.POSIXct(DATE)) %>%
filter(max(DATE) - DATE < 7 * 86400) %>%
select(-DATE) %>% mutate_if(is.character, as.numeric) %>%
summarize_all(function(x) diff(range(x)))
```
Negatives and positives for WI.
```{r}
wiHist[1:2] %>%
kprint()
```
Positive for WI by age group.
```{r}
(wiHistPos <- wiHist %>%
pivot_longer(POS_0_9:POS_90, names_to = "age", values_to = "pos") %>%
filter(!is.na(pos)) %>%
mutate(age = str_remove(age, "POS_"))) %>%
kprint
```
In all the state of Wisconsin, the percent of positives from people between 20 and 29 years old is:
```{r}
pct_pos_20_29 = (wiHistPos[wiHistPos$age == "20_29","pos"]/sum(wiHistPos[,"pos"]))*100
pct_pos_20_29 %>%
kprint
```
Negatives and positives by county in WI.
```{r}
(wiHistCo <- data_WI %>%
filter(GEO == "County") %>%
select(DATE, NAME, NEGATIVE, POSITIVE) %>%
rename(county = "NAME") %>%
mutate(DATE = as.POSIXct(DATE)) %>%
filter(max(DATE) - DATE < 7 * 86400) %>%
select(-DATE) %>%
group_by(county) %>%
mutate(NEGATIVE = as.numeric(NEGATIVE), POSITIVE = as.numeric(POSITIVE)) %>%
summarize_all(function(x) diff(range(x))) %>%
ungroup %>%
mutate(pct_pos = 100 * POSITIVE / (POSITIVE + NEGATIVE)) %>%
arrange(desc(pct_pos))) %>%
kprint()
```
If we assume that the same percent of positives in each county comes from people between 20 and 29 years old, we can adjust the count of positive cases by multiplying
### Census Data on age distribution
```{r}
(wiHistCo <- wiHistCo %>%
mutate( ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29 = as.numeric(pct_pos_20_29/100)*POSITIVE ) %>%
mutate( ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29 = round(ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29,0) ) )%>%
kprint()
```
These data are from Census <https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-counties-detail.html>
using the ALLDATA set. These data have age distribution in the most recent year. FIPS for WI is 55.
```{r}
# AGEGRP 0=total, 1:18 in 5-year intervals
ccest <- read_csv("data/cc-est2019-alldata-55.csv") %>%
filter(YEAR == max(YEAR)) %>% # most recent year
select(CTYNAME, AGEGRP, TOT_POP) %>%
rename(county = "CTYNAME",
age = "AGEGRP",
pop = "TOT_POP") %>%
mutate(county = str_remove(county, " County"))
ccest_tot <- ccest %>%
filter(age == 0)
(ccest <- left_join(
ccest %>%
filter(age > 0) %>%
mutate(age = unique(wiHistPos$age)[ceiling(age / 2)]),
ccest_tot %>% select(-age) %>% rename(tot = "pop"),
by = c("county")) %>%
mutate(pct = 100 * pop / tot) %>%
group_by(county, age, tot) %>%
summarize_all(sum) %>%
ungroup) %>%
filter(age == "20_29") %>%
arrange(desc(pop)) %>%
kprint()
```
The total count for all Wisconsin is
```{r}
(ccest_WI <- ccest %>%
filter(age == "20_29") %>%
select(age, tot, pop) %>%
summarize(tot = sum(tot), pop = sum(pop)) %>%
mutate(pct = 100 * pop / tot) %>%
mutate(age = "20_29") %>%
relocate(age)) %>%
kprint()
```
If we assume that the tests were applied uniformly in all the population (without importance of age), we can adjust the number of tests (NEGATIVE + POSITIVE) by multiplying
```{r}
(wiPOSco_20_29 <- full_join( ccest %>% filter(age == "20_29"),
wiHistCo,
by = "county") %>%
select(-tot, -pop) %>%
mutate(TOTAL_TESTS = NEGATIVE + POSITIVE) %>%
mutate(ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29 = (pct/100)*TOTAL_TESTS) %>%
mutate(ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29 = round(ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29,0)) %>%
#mutate(adj_pct_pos_20_29 = 100*(ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29/ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29)) %>%
select(-POSITIVE, -NEGATIVE, -pct, -age, -pct_pos, -TOTAL_TESTS)) %>%
kprint()
```
Using an approach from Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA), we simulate 1000 observations of a Beta distribution with parameters a =ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29 + 1 and b = ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29 - ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29 + 1.
```{r}
library(boot)
confidence = function(a,b){
x = rbeta(1000, a, b)
x.boot = one.boot(x, mean, R=1000)
#confi = boot.ci(x.boot, type="bca")
resulta = perc(x.boot, p = c(0.025, 0.50, 0.975))
return( c( resulta[1], resulta[2], resulta[3] ) )
}
wiPOSco_20_29 <- wiPOSco_20_29 %>%
mutate(a = ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29 + 1, b = ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29 - ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29 + 1) %>%
rowwise() %>%
mutate(confidence_int = list(confidence(a,b)) )
(wiPOSco_20_29 <- wiPOSco_20_29 %>% rowwise() %>%
mutate(lower_pos = 100*confidence_int[1], upper_pos = 100*confidence_int[3],
median_pos = 100*confidence_int[2] ) %>%
select(-confidence_int)) %>%
kprint()
```
```{r}
ggplot(ccest %>% filter(age == "20_29")) +
aes(tot, pct) +
geom_point() +
scale_x_log10() +
xlab("County Population") +
ylab("Percent aged 20-29")
```
```{r}
co_data <- full_join(
ccest %>%
filter(age == "20_29"),
wiPOSco_20_29, #wiHistCo
by = "county")
co_data = co_data %>% select(-ADJ_POSITIVE_20_29, -ADJ_TOTAL_TESTS_20_29,-a,-b)
```
```{r}
ggplot(co_data) +
aes(pct, median_pos) +
geom_point() +
ylab("Percent Postive COVID-19 among 20-29 people") +
xlab("Percent aged 20-29")
```
### WI Dormitory arrival
This file (in Box as [COVID-19/Aggregated Data/Fall 2020 Housing State County Country.xlsx](https://uwmadison.box.com/s/bx0qyaabylhjpy062qzzhy2punlywrug)) contains records with county level information from across the country. Only looking here at WI counties.
```{r}
wiDorm <- read_excel("data/Fall 2020 Housing State County Country.xlsx") %>%
rename(state = "HOME_ADDRESS_STATE",
county = "HOME_COUNTY_DESCR") %>%
mutate(state = ifelse(HOME_COUNTRY_CODE != "USA", "international", state),
state = ifelse(state == "AE", "international", state)) %>%
count(state, county) %>%
rename(students = "n") %>%
arrange(state, county) %>%
filter(state == "WI")
```
```{r}
wiDorm_test <- full_join(
co_data,
wiDorm,
by = "county")
```
```{r}
ggplot(wiDorm_test) +
aes(students, median_pos) +
geom_point() +
scale_x_log10() +
ylab("Percent Postive COVID-19 among 20-29 people") +
xlab("Number of Students in Dorm")
```
There are three counties accounting for most of the dorm students. Question is, can we get better age-group estimates of the percent positive on diagnostic test?
```{r}
wiDorm_test %>%
filter(students > 400) %>%
kprint()
```
```{r}
ggplot(wiDorm_test) +
aes(students, students * median_pos / 100) +
geom_point() +
scale_x_log10() +
scale_y_log10() +
ylab("Expected Postive COVID-19 based on County") +
xlab("Number of Students in Dorm")
```
```{r}
(wiDorm_pos <- wiDorm_test %>%
mutate(students_pos = students * median_pos / 100) %>%
mutate(lower_st_pos = students * lower_pos / 100) %>%
mutate(upper_st_pos = students * upper_pos / 100) %>%
select(county, students, lower_pos, median_pos, upper_pos,
lower_st_pos, students_pos, upper_st_pos) %>%
arrange(desc(students_pos))) %>%
kprint()
```
Expected number of students positive: `r round(sum(wiDorm_pos$students_pos, na.rm = TRUE))`.
### Combine data and save as CSV
```{r}
write_csv(wiDorm_test, "wi_dorm_test.csv")
```
### Remarks
- We are assuming that 18 and 19 year old students behave the same as the 20-29 y old students do, but is this true? Starting junior year in college, many students move out of the dorms. So, our estimate might be underestimates
- Need the latest test results, because having been positive at some point is not the asame as arriving and being infectious. Consider narrowing the date of testing results in the Covid-19 historical data table.
- Be careful with county level data for students, because they might become identifiable.
- Calculate number of positives for all counties and all arriving states, but we know that this data might not be available for all states and counties (see Florida example).
### References
- Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) by Vose et al 2003, 2009