Software License

[jenson-chang]

From https://choosealicense.com, I think our current MIT license is appropriate. I don't think proprietary that we've added in our code and I think it's fine for others to do anything they want with it. What do you guys think?

[Piloxita]

I agree with you Jenson! It makes sense to use the MIT license for our scikit-learn wrapper package, as it aligns with open-source principles and allows broad usage without restrictions. Since scikit-learn itself is licensed under a BSD-3 license, the MIT license is similarly permissive and widely accepted in the open-source community.

[gunishakaur]

Sounds good, Jenson! MIT is a good choice for open-source and works well with scikit-learn's BSD-3 license. I agree with Long! MIT is a great fit - permissive, popular, and keeps things simple for our scikit-learn wrapper. Thanks for raising this!

[hanwang205]

I totally agree, Jenson! The MIT license is a perfect fit for our project. It's permissive and well-known, making it a simple choice for our scikit-learn wrapper. Given that scikit-learn is under a BSD-3 license, MIT keeps everything consistent and open. Thanks for bringing this up—it's a solid decision!