You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The smaller figsize, the thinner the border at a given thickness, which is normal. However, if figsize is too small, the border in the generated pdf/png figure may disappear. A "nice" example is the one from our current ms, where the border has many holes.
first: add interpolation='None' in border (see issues)
After a few test: a good compromise is to have figsize>=8,8 and border_thickness not below 0.005 for figsize=8,8
Obviously, this is not very convenient to generate e.g. figures with multiple subplots. We should think of a solution where border_thickness is, by default, automatically adapted to lead to the "thinnest" apparent border (a linear relationship wrt figsize?)
rem: it also depends on the value of outer_radius (may not be the case with interpolation='None')
The smaller figsize, the thinner the border at a given thickness, which is normal. However, if figsize is too small, the border in the generated pdf/png figure may disappear. A "nice" example is the one from our current ms, where the border has many holes.
A possible solution: imposing a minimum figsize.
fig_20_20_thick0.01.pdf
fig_10_10_thick0.01.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: