-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
1994-10_Monolithic-BOD-Microstructure
257 lines (210 loc) · 13.8 KB
/
1994-10_Monolithic-BOD-Microstructure
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
Abstract
Monolithic bridge-on-diaphragm (BOD) microstructures for sensor applications were
fabricated by means of laser machining and anisotropic etching techniques. The
pressure-frequency-characteristic was measured by acoustical excitation of the
microbridge to resonant vibrations and optical detection of the resonance frequency.
In the pressure range between 0.8 bar and +1.0 bar the pressure-frequency-char
acteristic is almost linear with a sensitivity of about 4.5 kHz/bar and with a fundamen
tal bridge resonance frequency of 82.08 kHz. Finite element analysis was used to
optimize the geometrical dimensions of the sensor structure with respect to maximum
sensitivity and pressure range. With the same BOD sensor layout it is possible to
realize pressure sensors for the range between 0.5 and 12 bar only by variing the
thickness of the diaphragm. BOD sensors with smaller dimensions can be operated
up to 100 bar with a pressure sensitivity of about 141 Hz/bar.
1. Introduction
Micromechanical sensors based on resonating elements have become important in
the field of precision measurement technique because of their high sensitivity, high
resolution, and semi-digital output. Resonant beams are well suited for the detection
of forces, as the resonance frequency depends on the mechanical stress which is
induced by an applied axial force. For the realization of pressure sensors a resonat-
ing beam connected to a diaphragm at both ends ("bridge-on-diaphragm") is pre-
ferred. In this case the pressure sensitive element (diaphragm) and the resonator
(bridge) are separated. The resonating element can therefore be encapsulated in
vacuum to get higher Q-factors in order to increase the resolution.
In recent years several bridge-on-diaphragm (BOD) pressure sensors were realized.
Greenwood and Satchell [1] have produced 6 um thin resonating structures on a
6 um thin diaphragm of highly boron doped silicon by selective and anisotropic
etching techniques. Thornton et al. [2] fabricated 2 um thin boron-doped silicon
resonator structures on a 30 um thick silicon diaphragm. Due to this fabrication
technique the thickness of the resonator is limited to few microns. Furthermore, the
high dopant concentration causes intrinsic stresses which determines the sensor
characteristics. Buser et al. [3] used Si-Si bonding techniques to produce silicon
beams with lower dopant concentrations and higher thickness on a silicon dia-
phragm. However, for the bonding procedure high temperatures are necessary.
Furthermore, the resonator has to be separated manually from the supporting frame,
so that batch processing is not feasible. In addition, any electrical contact of the
beam is difficult to realize.
In the following we present a novel
BOD microstructure for sensor applica
tions, which has been fabricated mo
nolithically in silicon without any use of
bonding or doping techniques. The
microbridge is clamped between two
supporting piers which are connected
directly to the diaphragm (see Fig. 1).
A pressure applied to the BOD struc-
ture leads to a deformation of the dia-
phragm and therefore to an axial
stress in the microbridge. For sensor
applications, the BOD structure can be
operated with piezoresistors on the bridge surface to obtain analog output signals.
Alternatively, the microbridge can be excited to resonant vibrations either by piezo-
electric thin films or electrothermally by diffused resistors, for example, and the
change of the resonance frequency induced by the axial stress can be detected.
Electrical interconnection between the microbridge and external bonding pads is
established via the supporting piers.
2. Experimental
2.1 Fabrication process
The monolithic BOD microstructure has been fabricated by combination of
laser micromachining and anisotropic etching techniques. The principle of this
fabrication method is based on the local destruction of {111} crystal planes by
a laser beam. During the laser treatment the silicon wafer is precisely moved
by a computer controlled xy-table. Following anisotropic etching in KOH
solution leads to the formation of new types of microstructures [4]. In <110>
oriented silicon wafers microbridges with triangular cross sections have been
produced [5].
For the fabrication of the monolithic BOD microstructures three inch <110>
silicon wafers with a thickness
of 380 æm covered with a ther
mally-grown 1.5 æm SiO2 layer
were used. In a standard photo
lithographic process the SiO2
layer was patterned to define
the dimensions of the micro-
bridge, the supporting piers,
and the diaphragm. In a second
step the crystal order of the sili
con substrate was locally dam-
aged down to a defined depth
by scanning the focused beam
of a Nd:YAG laser across the
wafer surface. During the follow-
ing anisotropic etching in KOH
solution the monolithic BOD
microstructure was formed.
Fig. 2 shows the total view of a
monolithic BOD microstructure.
The dimensions of the dia-
phragm are 5 mm 5 mm
150 um. The microbridge is ap
proximately 2 mm long and ori-
ented parallel to the [10] direc-
tion. Its sidewalls are consisting
of {111} planes with an angle of
35ø to the (110) wafer surface
resulting in a triangular cross
section (width = 120 um,
thickness ÷ 37 um). Fig. 3
shows the clamping region of
the microbridge with one supporting pier (left) and the end of the bridge
(right). At both bridge ends {111} planes vertical to the substrate surface were
additionally left to minimize the mechanical stress in the clamping region if the
sensor structure is loaded with pressure.
2.2 Measurements and results
To characterize the dynamic behavior of the BOD structure it is excited to
resonant vibrations by a piezoelectric ceramic disk and interrogated optically
by a laser vibrometer (POLYTEC OFV 1102 HR). The output signal of the
vibrometer is fed to a computer-controlled spectrum analyzer (Hewlett-Packard
3588A) with a personal computer data acquisition system which directly dis
plays the frequency spectrum.
The BOD structures were mounted on a test equipment, where air pressure or
vacuum can be introduced to the back side of the diaphragm while the front
side including the supporting piers and the microbridge remains at atmos-
pheric pressure. The frequency of the first fundamental bridge flexure mode
was measured in dependence of the pressure difference (back side to front
side) in the range between 0.8 bar (vacuum) and +1.0 bar. Fig. 4 shows the
pressure-frequency characteristic of the monolithic BOD microstructure. The
fundamental resonance frequency has been determined to 82.08 kHz, and the
pressure sensitivity is approximately 4.5 kHz/bar, related to the investigated
pressure range. At atmospheric pressure a Q-factor of about 500 was
achieved.
3. Optimization of the sensor characteristics
The following investigations were accomplished to optimize the sensor geometry with
respect to the sensor characteristics, relating the pressure sensitivity and the maximal
load which can be introduced to the sensor structure without break or damage. Due
to the detecting principle it is evident, that the pressure sensitivity will be enhanced
if the stress in the microbridge is increased at constant pressure difference. As there
are no analytical formulas available concerning the dynamic behavior of this complex
sensor geometry, finite-element (FE) analysis was used to predict the sensor charac
teristics and to analyse geometric modifications on the sensor performance.
3.1 Simulation of the BOD sensor structure
A three dimensional FE model of the sensor structure was created with I-DEAS
(SDRC), and FE simulations were carried out with ANSYS using one quarter of
the BOD sensor structure and considering anisotropic material properties of
single crystal silicon. For these calculations a bridge length of 1.95 mm and a
thickness of 42.4 æm were assumed. In Fig. 5 the geometry of the quarter
model and the results of the FE calculations are presented. In the upper left
window (1) the displacements uz of the sensor structure caused by a pressure
difference acting on the diaphragm are shown. By applying a pressure differ-
ence of 1 bar the maximum displacement of the diaphragm is about 1 æm.
Due to the leverage principle a stress concentration occurs in the microbridge
resulting in a maximum tensile stress åy of about 24.7 MPa as shown in win-
dow (2). The finite element mesh was refined in the bridge and in the clamp-
ing region as shown in window (3) to get a better stress resolution. Due to the
complex geometry the BOD structure is able to vibrate in several different
flexure modes. For the following calculations only the first fundamental flexure
mode of the bridge and the first antisymmetric coupled mode of the bridge
and the diaphragm were considered (4).
3.2 Variation of the diaphragm thickness
As a strong influence on the pressure sensitivity is expected, the diaphragm
thickness was varied in the range between 50 and 300 æm while the remaining
geometrical dimensions were kept constant. The corresponding resonance
frequencies of the diaphragm (f_diaphragm) and the bridge (f_bridge) were calculated.
While the frequency of the first fundamental bridge flexure mode is nearly
independent of the diaphragm thickness, the frequency of the diaphragm is
approximately proportional to its thickness as shown in Fig. 6. At a thickness
of about 130 um there is a cross-over of the resonance frequencies. This
geometrical constellation should be avoided, because the vibration energy of
the bridge will be transferred into the diaphragm due to mode coupling lead-
ing to a reduction of the Q-factor. Additionally, the unimodality of the BOD
sensor structure is drastically decreased.
The resonance frequencies of the microbridges were calculated in depend-
ence of the pressure difference in the region between 0 and 1 bar for different
diaphragm thicknesses. The frequency-pressure-characteristics for the first
fundamental bridge flexure mode is shown in Fig. 7. As expected, the pressure
sensitivity decreases with increasing diaphragm thickness. The pressure
difference pmax, where the stress åmax in the bridge amounts to a quarter of the
break stress of single crystal silicon, had not been exceeded. For diaphragm
thicknesses below 130 æm the pressure range is reduced, because the stiff
nesses of the supporting piers and the diaphragm become comparable resul
ting in a weakening of the levering mechanism, accompanied with a decrease
of the resonance frequency. With this BOD sensor geometry it is possible to
realize pressure sensors in the region between 0.5 and 12 bar with identical
layout only by adapting the diaphragm thickness.
The fundamental bridge resonance frequency has been calculated to 95.4 kHz
which differs from the experimental value (82.1 kHz). This difference is caused
by the fact, that for the simulation an ideal triangular bridge with a thickness of
42.4 um and with a length of 1.95 mm has been assumed. In contrast, the
fabricated bridge is (1.99 +/- 0.04) mm long. Additionally, its thickness is re-
duced to (37 +/- 5) um, because the convex edge at the bottom of the bridge
has been attacked by the etchant.
3.3 Variation of the diaphragm side length
By reducing the diaphragm side length higher pressures can be detected. FE
calculations were carried out for a 2 mm 2 mm 300 um diaphragm in
combination with a 1 mm 120 um 42.4 um microbridge. The fundamental
resonance frequency has been calculated to 386 kHz, and the pressure sensi
tivity is about 141 Hz/bar in the range between 0 and 100 bar. At the maximum
pressure difference pmax = 100 bar a tensile stress of max ÷ 60 MPa will occur
in the microbridge.
4. Conclusions
Monolithic bridge-on-diaphragm microstructures for sensor applications were fabri-
cated by means of laser machining and anisotropic etching techniques. The fabri-
cation procedure of the sensor structure is reproducible and suited for batch proc-
essing. As the excellent mechanical properties of single crystal silicon are preserved,
sensors based on this structure have high sensitivity combined with high linearity.
Furthermore, extremely high Q-factors can be achieved by vacuum encapsulation of
the bridge resonator. By variation of the geometrical dimensions pressure sensors
based on BOD structures can be fabricated for a wide pressure range.
5. References
[1] J. C. Greenwood, D. W. Satchell, Miniature silicon resonant pressure sensor,
IEE Proceedings, Vol. 135, No. 5 (1988) 369 372.
[2] K. E. B. Thornton, D. Uttamchandani, B. Culshaw, A sensitive optically excited
resonator pressure sensor, Sensors and Actuators A, 24 (1990) 15 19.
[3] R. A. Buser, L. Schultheis, N. F. de Rooij, Silicon pressure sensor based on a
resonating element, Sensors and Actuators A, 25 27 (1991) 717 722.
[4] M. Alavi, S. Bttgenbach, A. Schumacher, H.-J. Wagner, New microstructures
in silicon using laser machining and anisotropic etching, Proc. Micro System
Technologies '91, Berlin, Oct. 29 Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 322 324.
[5] M. Alavi, Th. Fabula, A. Schumacher, H.-J. Wagner, Monolithic microbridges in
silicon using laser machining and anisotropic etching, Sensors and Actuators
A, 37 38 (1993) 661 665.