You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I am using scDC to do the DA analysis, and i am a little confused about "scDC_noClustering" and "scDC_Clustering" cause i can not find a description indicating the difference between these two Function.
My sc-data was analysis by the Seurat toolkit and annotated into 14 celltype. Is that means I already got 14 "Clusters"? So my DA pipline should be scDC_Clustering followed by fitGLM ? Is it wrong i use scDC_noClustering ?
Thank you for the scDC package. Appreciate for your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I am using scDC to do the DA analysis, and i am a little confused about "scDC_noClustering" and "scDC_Clustering" cause i can not find a description indicating the difference between these two Function. My sc-data was analysis by the Seurat toolkit and annotated into 14 celltype. Is that means I already got 14 "Clusters"? So my DA pipline should be scDC_Clustering followed by fitGLM ? Is it wrong i use scDC_noClustering ? Thank you for the scDC package. Appreciate for your reply.
sorry, I found that
performed without clustering,the estimation does not take into account for the variability from clustering algorithm, and only takes variability from the population into account. When performed with clustering, the estimation takes both into consideration.
Hi,
I am using scDC to do the DA analysis, and i am a little confused about "scDC_noClustering" and "scDC_Clustering" cause i can not find a description indicating the difference between these two Function.
My sc-data was analysis by the Seurat toolkit and annotated into 14 celltype. Is that means I already got 14 "Clusters"? So my DA pipline should be
scDC_Clustering
followed byfitGLM
? Is it wrong i usescDC_noClustering
?Thank you for the scDC package. Appreciate for your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: