Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package Control instructions out of date? #15

Closed
nk9 opened this issue Jul 22, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #21
Closed

Package Control instructions out of date? #15

nk9 opened this issue Jul 22, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #21
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@nk9
Copy link

nk9 commented Jul 22, 2022

Description of the bug

I go to install BJ via Package Control with the steps given in the README, and it's not listed.

I'm seeing this with ST 4126.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Cmd-Shift-P
  2. Package Control: Install Package
  3. Type "BetterJinja"
  4. Nothing listed

I've also checked that it's not installed already, and it's not. It doesn't seem to be listed on the PC website either.

Expected behavior

Based on the README, I'd expect to be able to install it this way.

Actual behavior

No installation happening. But in reality, it seems the name of the package has changed to "Jinja2". When I install that, the message says that I've installed BetterJinja v1.1.0.

BetterJinja version

N/A

@nk9 nk9 changed the title BetterJinja not listed in Package Control? Package Control instructions out of date? Jul 22, 2022
@UltraInstinct05 UltraInstinct05 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 13, 2022
@UltraInstinct05
Copy link
Contributor

Apologies for the late reply. Indeed, the repository name is BetterJinja but it's available as Jinja2 on PC. The README needs to be updated with this regards.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants