-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reorganize CI #343
Comments
Nice breakdown. The proposal by @cognifloyd looks good to me as well 👍 |
@cognifloyd I'm not sure we can accomplish "ci/circleci: E2E Tests / minikube". I don't see the workflow name showing up, and, the slash isn't allowed. |
Well, bummer.
https://circleci.com/docs/reusing-config/#notes-on-reusable-configuration So the CircleCI job name will look different from the GHA workflow/job names since we are very restricted on allowed characters. Maybe we could use the job name: |
Thanks a lot! 💯 |
For external reporters, the service reports its name before the
:
. CircleCI chose to report their name with theci/
prefix.I think listing "CI" is redundant. GHA is CI. All the listed checks are CI. Ideally I would like to see something meaningful for the names of workflows and jobs. We're stuck with the pointless
ci/
prefix onci/circleci
. But everything else can be more helpful.Currently we have lint combined with e2e tests to avoid running the e2e tests unless the lint checks pass. If we are willing to skip that optimization, then I propose we split things into these workflows and jobs:
That would lead to something that looks like this:
For CircleCI, we can add the slash in our workflow name, assuming they don't disallow that character, to make it read more like the pattern GHA supplies.
If, on the other hand, you want the
CI /
prefix, then we have to either:CI / Lint
andCI / E2E Tests
), orI do not want to combine the workflows (option 2) because that makes restarting them more painful, and it makes the workflow file much longer and harder to maintain.
Originally posted by @cognifloyd in #341 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: