Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make separate libraries for different softwares #2

Open
sofian opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Make separate libraries for different softwares #2

sofian opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@sofian
Copy link
Contributor

sofian commented Jun 6, 2018

Currently, support for Max, Processing, TouchDesigner, etc. are provided in a separate folder in each library. However, I think what would be nice is to make the libraries available under different projects (repositories) (eg. processing-AsciiMassage) so that for example they can be installed more easily from within each of these platforms.

However I would also recommend writing an online documentation that would reflect this and point to the right resources. See for example how Libossia (https://ossia.github.io/) does it for documentation on multi-platform (not saying they are the best example, actually, but it's just to show the idea that Massage could be portrayed as a multi-platform / multi-language standard rather than just an Arduino library).

@sofian sofian added the question label Jun 6, 2018
@thomasfredericks
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that would be ideal, but I do not have the time to make all that documentation. What I could do is split the AsciiMassage implementations for Processing and friends into separate repositories. But a new problem arises, where the examples are split (one half in the AsciiMassage Arduino repository and the other in the Processing repository).

@sofian
Copy link
Contributor Author

sofian commented Jun 11, 2018

Maybe it's okay to keep it that way for now. At my University I could have a student work on this in the Fall if you could help give them some supervision. We can find someone with basic knowledge of code who is also good at writing documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants