Add support for nested/recursive tags for BC-tag-note frontmatter field

[DevJake]

Hey there! Great plugin, I'm enjoying getting up to speed with things. However, I've noticed that the BC-tag-note field doesn't seem to support nested tags. So if I had the following structure of tags:

• #A
• #A/B
• #A/C

Such that #B and #C are children of #A, if I were to set a note to accept BC-tag-note: '#A', it would recursively include all nested tags. Whilst this is useful in some scenarios, it's also an issue in others. An optional field, such as BC-tag-note-explicit: [true/false] or BC-tag-note-depth: [int; 1 for ignoring nesting] to only accept notes with a top-level tag (ignoring nesting) would be perfect!

There might be a potential workaround for this now, but since I'm still getting to grips with things, I'm not sure. I appreciate any input that can be offered!

[SkepticMystic]

Hmmm I see, I see. So this isn't a feature request for a BC-recursive-tag-note feature. More a request to be able to limit which tags get included?

[DevJake]

Yes, absolutely! At the moment, tags are included recursively. To disable recursive tags on selective notes with the BC-tag-note field would be great!

[SkepticMystic]

I've just added support for this with BC-tag-note-exact: true :)

[DevJake]

Just tested it out and it works brilliantly. Thank you so much for your speed in adding this in!!