From 2c87d1b8642b47b21713b30056133b914f1408d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hari Hara Naveen S <harihara.sn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:04:03 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] fixed error in test

---
 .../include/hpx/synchronization/range_mutex.hpp       |  4 ++--
 .../tests/unit/range_mutex/range_mutex_util.hpp       | 11 ++++++-----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libs/core/synchronization/include/hpx/synchronization/range_mutex.hpp b/libs/core/synchronization/include/hpx/synchronization/range_mutex.hpp
index be79509e7fcf..70c77fa12259 100644
--- a/libs/core/synchronization/include/hpx/synchronization/range_mutex.hpp
+++ b/libs/core/synchronization/include/hpx/synchronization/range_mutex.hpp
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ namespace hpx::synchronization {
                 std::error_code ec = std::make_error_code(
                     std::errc::resource_deadlock_would_occur);
                 throw std::system_error(
-                    ec, "unique_lock::lock: already locked");
+                    ec, "range_unique_lock::lock: already locked");
             }
             lock_id = mutex_ref.get().lock(begin, end);
         }
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ namespace hpx::synchronization {
                 std::error_code ec = std::make_error_code(
                     std::errc::resource_deadlock_would_occur);
                 throw std::system_error(
-                    ec, "unique_lock::lock: already locked");
+                    ec, "range_unique_lock::lock: already locked");
             }
             lock_id = mutex_ref.get().try_lock(begin, end);
         }
diff --git a/libs/core/synchronization/tests/unit/range_mutex/range_mutex_util.hpp b/libs/core/synchronization/tests/unit/range_mutex/range_mutex_util.hpp
index 08d2003b7497..3d51ceff8c2c 100644
--- a/libs/core/synchronization/tests/unit/range_mutex/range_mutex_util.hpp
+++ b/libs/core/synchronization/tests/unit/range_mutex/range_mutex_util.hpp
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ namespace hpx::ranged_lock::test::util {
     NOTE : Critical Section should take care of obtaining the lock
             passed as first parameter
     */
-    template <typename Lock, typename RangeEndGen, typename CriticalSection>
+    template <typename RangeMutex, typename RangeEndGen,
+        typename CriticalSection>
     void test_lock_once(std::size_t const len, std::size_t const num_threads,
         std::size_t const num_incr_per_thread, RangeEndGen&& range_end_gen,
         CriticalSection&& critical_section)
@@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ namespace hpx::ranged_lock::test::util {
             get_increment_ranges(num_incr_per_thread * num_threads, len,
                 std::forward<RangeEndGen>(range_end_gen));
 
-        Lock bl;
+        RangeMutex rmtx;
 
         for (std::size_t i = 0; i != num_threads; i++)
         {
@@ -99,18 +100,18 @@ namespace hpx::ranged_lock::test::util {
                 increments.begin() + ((i + 1) * num_incr_per_thread);
 
             threads.emplace_back(
-                [&bl, &v, &critical_section, start_iter, end_iter]() {
+                [&rmtx, &v, &critical_section, start_iter, end_iter]() {
                     increments_ty::iterator it = start_iter;
                     for (; it != end_iter; ++it)
                     {
                         std::size_t begin = it->first;
                         std::size_t end = it->second;
 
-                        std::size_t lockId = bl.lock(begin, end);
+                        std::size_t lockId = rmtx.lock(begin, end);
 
                         critical_section(v, begin, end);
 
-                        bl.unlock(lockId);
+                        rmtx.unlock(lockId);
                     }
                 });
         }