From 6c091220395818f7fdd2cd0642c1bbba214d2311 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoine Pultier <45740+fungiboletus@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 23:34:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?feat:=20=F0=9F=93=9D=20Forgot=20to=20say=20some?=
 =?UTF-8?q?thing.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 docs/blog-post.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/blog-post.md b/docs/blog-post.md
index d08e649..b1dc119 100644
--- a/docs/blog-post.md
+++ b/docs/blog-post.md
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ The [2023 Survey of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF)](https://www.cn
 
 [A Standford magazine article](https://stanfordmag.org/contents/carbon-and-the-cloud) estimates the environmental footprint of 100GB stored in the cloud at about 200kg of CO₂ per year.
 
-That's also a conservative number. We know that [CloudFlare has about 5 billion time series](https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-cloudflare-runs-prometheus-at-scale/), and the fix may save them about 50 gigabytes.
+That's also a conservative number. We know that [CloudFlare has about 5 billion time series](https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-cloudflare-runs-prometheus-at-scale/), and the fix may save them about 50 gigabytes. They are likely not alone to use Prometheus at large scale.
 
 It's also a wild guess with many assumptions and uncertainties. We didn't consider that many chunks are read at frequent intervals, potentially over the network. Estimating CO₂ emissions of software in the cloud [is a complex topic](https://www.cloudcarbonfootprint.org/docs/methodology).