We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I train a model of wood using the command:
python run_training.py --head_layer 2 --type wood
Then in the evaluate process, is use the model to evaluate the type of bottle , I got a surprisingly excellent result:
AUC: 0.9949454642192073
Is there any problem here?
I just used the following hard code to evaluate (in eval.py line 258):
roc_auc = eval_model(model_name, 'bottle', save_plots=args.save_plots, device=device, head_layer=args.head_layer, density=density())
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just used the following hard code to evaluate (in eval.py line 258): roc_auc = eval_model(model_name, 'bottle', save_plots=args.save_plots, device=device, head_layer=args.head_layer, density=density()) Thanks!
You hard coded bottle as the second argument. So I suspect you get the AUC of that class.
bottle
Instead of hardcoding you could also use the eval script:
python eval.py --head_layer 2 --type wood
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I train a model of wood using the command:
Then in the evaluate process, is use the model to evaluate the type of bottle , I got a surprisingly excellent result:
Is there any problem here?
I just used the following hard code to evaluate (in eval.py line 258):
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: