Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is x-tags supposed to be implemented? #2148

Closed
michaelgwelch opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2355
Closed

Is x-tags supposed to be implemented? #2148

michaelgwelch opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2355

Comments

@michaelgwelch
Copy link

Describe the problem to be solved
Implement x-tags as documented already: x-tags

In testing we've found it not to work and the README does not list it as an extension (so I assume it's not actually been implemented?):
https://github.com/Redocly/redoc#openapi-specification-extensions

Describe the solution you'd like
As documented.

Describe alternatives you've considered
We're using <SchemaDefinition> but then when used with redocly it triggers the no-unused-components inspection rule.

@michaelgwelch
Copy link
Author

This was answered by @adamaltman in Redocly/redocly-cli#838. Apparently this is in the premium product only.

@adamaltman
Copy link
Member

Let's leave this open here so we can discuss implementing it in Redoc.

@RomanHotsiy
Copy link
Member

Let's implement it.

cc @AlexVarchuk

@cykl
Copy link

cykl commented Jun 19, 2023

Have you any idea of when it will be available? I'm trying to evaluate options / appropriate workaround effort.

@AlexVarchuk AlexVarchuk self-assigned this Jul 10, 2023
@AlexVarchuk AlexVarchuk mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2023
3 tasks
@lornajane
Copy link
Contributor

This feature has been merged now (thanks @AlexVarchuk !), so you'll find it on the main branch. It will be in Redoc itself at the next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants