Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented the scheduler version of the 'Return' operator #452

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2013

Conversation

zsxwing
Copy link
Member

@zsxwing zsxwing commented Oct 25, 2013

Hi, this is the scheduler version of the 'Return' operator #73.

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

RxJava-pull-requests #371 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2013
Implemented the scheduler version of the 'Return' operator
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit 7b997a8 into ReactiveX:master Oct 31, 2013
@zsxwing zsxwing deleted the return branch November 1, 2013 06:53
rickbw pushed a commit to rickbw/RxJava that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2014
Implemented the scheduler version of the 'Return' operator
jihoonson pushed a commit to jihoonson/RxJava that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
…bscriber is is not permitted to subscribe, the subscription must be canceled and the ResilienceBaseSubscriber must call onSubscribe on the target Subscriber with an EmptySubscription followed by a call to onError with the supplied error. (ReactiveX#452)

Issue ReactiveX#357: Fixed a bug in ResilienceBaseSubscriber. If a subscriber is is not permitted to subscribe, the subscription must be canceled and the ResilienceBaseSubscriber must call onSubscribe on the target Subscriber with an EmptySubscription followed by a call to onError with the supplied error. The bug was that the ResilienceBaseSubscriber cancelled it's own subscription as well.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants