Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StringObservable.split NPE fixes #1664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2014

Conversation

davidmoten
Copy link
Collaborator

check for null values of leftOver in onCompleted and onError.

Added two failing unit tests that passed with fix.

@benjchristensen I suppose should I make PR on RxJavaString as well?

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

ReactiveX » RxJava » RxJava-pull-requests #17 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

Yes, it will also need to be done against RxJavaString

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
StringObservable.split NPE fixes
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit 1b54d31 into ReactiveX:0.20.x Sep 4, 2014
@davidmoten
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@benchristensen This change was documented as in 0.20.4 release of rxjava-string but did not make it somehow. The 0.20.x branch contains the change. Can you update the documentation of 0.20.4 release to exclude this PR and add it to your list for 0.20.5 when/if ever that happens?

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

It was merged on September 4th into the 0.20.x branch. The 0.20.x branch was then released and tagged as 0.20.4 on September 5th.

You can see the commits and tags here: http://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/commits/0.20.x

How would 0.20.4 not contain the change when the build, release and tag happened a day after this pull request was merged?

@davidmoten
Copy link
Collaborator Author

My mistake Ben. Eclipse was showing old source code with the 0.20.4 dep, I'll sort it out. I went to maven central and downloaded the sources jar and checked it and all good. I should have done that check before posting. Cheers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants