Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RAMClustR: Add filtering, qc and plots for related steps #392

Closed
hechth opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #514
Closed

RAMClustR: Add filtering, qc and plots for related steps #392

hechth opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #514
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hechth
Copy link
Member

hechth commented Jul 24, 2023

Add the options to save plots generated with RAMClustR in a collection of PDFs

The filtering part creates the MSData output - the filtering section should also be made available in the wrapper with 2 options:

  • blank
  • cv
    both of them being a boolean and both can be selected.

If blank is selected, the parameters for the function need to be added (qc.tag, blank.tag, signal_to_noise (sn) and remove.blanks (boolean)).
None means that the filtering is disabled.
CV requires a qc.tag and a cv value (coefficient of variation).
The order of execution is filtering blanks < normalization < filtering cv.

The filtering step creates the following output
Image

The rc.qc. function should be added - this should be added as a boolean.
It is executed as last step of the workflow.
The rc.qc function creates the following output :
Image

@hechth hechth added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 22, 2024
@hechth hechth changed the title RAMClustR: Add plotting option RAMClustR: Add filtering, qc and plots for related steps Mar 21, 2024
@zargham-ahmad zargham-ahmad self-assigned this Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants