This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
[✨] Type Safety for useNavigate Function #62
Labels
[STAGE-2] incomplete implementation
Remove this label when implementation is complete
[STAGE-2] not fully covered by tests yet
Remove this label when tests are verified to cover the implementation
[STAGE-2] unresolved discussions left
Remove this label when all critical discussions are resolved on the issue
[STAGE-3] docs changes not added yet
Remove this label when the necessary documentation for the feature / change is added
[STAGE-3] missing 2 reviews for RFC PRs
Remove this label when at least 2 core team members reviewed and approved the RFC implementation
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Hello Qwik community,
I've been using Qwik in my project and I'm finding it very useful, especially the
useNavigate
function. It allows me to efficiently navigate through my site, rendering only the parts that change.However, I've noticed that the current implementation does not support type checking for the routes. As a TypeScript user, I find type checking to be a crucial part of my development process, as it catches potential errors early and improves the overall developer experience.
Describe the solution you'd like
I believe that having type-safe routes could be a significant improvement to the framework. For example, a possible implementation could involve defining a type that includes all possible routes in the application. Then, the
useNavigate
function could accept this type, enforcing type safety at the component level and ensuring that only valid routes can be passed in.Describe alternatives you've considered
Route Enumeration: One other possibility is to define an enumeration (enum) of all your routes. This would allow you to use the enum as the type for the useNavigate function, providing compile-time checks for the route names. The downside is that it could be a bit cumbersome to maintain as your application grows and the number of routes increases.
Additional context
I wanted to ask if there's any ongoing work related to this or if there's interest in the community for this kind of feature? And, of course, I'm interested in contributing to this effort if it aligns with the goals of the framework.
Thank you for your time and looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this.
Best regards,
Barel Mishal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: