Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG | list.ACTIVE.ext is not "stable" lists #21

Open
spirillen opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

BUG | list.ACTIVE.ext is not "stable" lists #21

spirillen opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@spirillen
Copy link

What is the problem you are experiencing?

I am experiencing a problem where...
It looks like @smed79 have spotted a bug i Phishing-Database/Phishing.Database#1208 as a record from cdpn.io

Present Not Present
phishing-links-ACTIVE.txt ALL-phishing-links.lst
phishing-domains-ACTIVE.txt ALL-phishing-domains.lst

This make both the "Not Present" file unreliable...

How can we reproduce the problem?

To reproduce the problem:

Do you have a screenshot?

Screenshot

What did you expect to happen?

I expected that...

Is there a workaround?

I found a workaround...

Additional context

I would like to add...

Log information

Click to expand
Paste your log file here between the back tics.
@spirillen
Copy link
Author

spirillen commented Mar 10, 2025

List source are equal, how are the lists distributed??

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mitchellkrogza/Phishing.Database/master/ =
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Phishing-Database/Phishing.Database/refs/heads/master/ =
https://phish.co.za/latest/

Which of the sources should we trust?? AND which one is the actual SOURCE?

@spirillen spirillen changed the title BUG | list.ACTIVE.ext not is "stable" lists BUG | list.ACTIVE.ext is not "stable" lists Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants