Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Test Coverage for ERC6372: Enhance Clock and Mode Validation #5165

Open
techvoyagerX opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@techvoyagerX
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

The current implementation of the ERC6372.behavior.js test suite provides basic coverage for clock validation and mode checks. While the existing tests serve their purpose, there are opportunities to improve the clarity, structure, and coverage of the tests to make them more robust and maintainable.

Proposed Enhancements:

Improved Test Descriptions:

Refactor test descriptions to be more descriptive and clear, ensuring that each test case is easily understandable.
Detailed Assertions:

Add custom error messages to assertions for better debugging when tests fail, particularly around the clock value and mode checks.
Additional Test Scenarios:

Introduce new test cases to cover edge cases and potential failure scenarios, such as handling unexpected clock modes or invalid parameters.
Code Organization:

Consider grouping related test cases together using describe blocks, to better organize the tests and enhance readability.
Impact:

These improvements will make the test suite more robust, easier to maintain, and more effective at catching potential issues. The enhanced clarity and structure will also help future contributors understand and extend the tests.

References:

Current Implementation of ERC6372.behavior.js
Additional Context:

I am willing to contribute to this enhancement and will submit a pull request once the issue is discussed and approved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant