You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Curious if you've thought about whether it's beneficial to use the jdk.incubator.vector library. I noticed your posted benchmark for xxHash (not sure which variant) is an impressive 9.5 GB/s, which is just under the native version's XXH32 speed of 9.7 GB/s. Can we get it to "RAM speeds" that the native version's XXH3 (with SSE2) advertises by using explicit vectorization?
Amazing work here in this library btw!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alexandergunnarson
changed the title
Beneficial to use jdk.incubator.vector library?
Beneficial to use jdk.incubator.vector?
Feb 6, 2025
Curious if you've thought about whether it's beneficial to use the jdk.incubator.vector library. I noticed your posted benchmark for xxHash (not sure which variant) is an impressive 9.5 GB/s, which is just under the native version's XXH32 speed of 9.7 GB/s. Can we get it to "RAM speeds" that the native version's XXH3 (with SSE2) advertises by using explicit vectorization?
Amazing work here in this library btw!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: