Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Specialization/Generalization relation directly between classes #11

Open
pedropaulofb opened this issue Sep 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Specialization/Generalization relation directly between classes #11

pedropaulofb opened this issue Sep 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pedropaulofb
Copy link
Member

The current version of the vocabulary does not have a specialization/generalization relation directly between classes - their relation is done via an individual of the class ontouml:Generalization, making it hard to manipulate the concepts (e.g., to verify transitive subClassOf relationships in SPARQL queries).

I suggest creating a derived relation between classes for that purpose.
@pedropaulofb pedropaulofb added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pedropaulofb