You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to report the following issue/feedback
I am not an ML person but feels that the OWASP Machine Learning Security Top Ten is generated by LLMs and there is a lot of errors in it. For example, the description of member inference attack, and the use of the terms such as "a malicious attacker" (Is there a benign attacker then?).
Code of Conduct
I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The project is currently in Work In Progress status, initial version was released as generated by some kind of LLM, we are working on delivering "actionable" release which is human-generated, e.g. this vulnerability was fully rewritten by me some time ago:
To my knowledge, the top 10 was originally created before the release of GPT and hasn't been influenced by LLM-generated content. However, it might have incorporated some LLM elements since then. By the way, we're also developing a GitHub bot to detect LLM-generated content in our pull requests. I have a similar tool for my personal projects, so I might just integrate it here.
Type
Documentation Issue Report
What would you like to report?
I would like to report the following issue/feedback
I am not an ML person but feels that the OWASP Machine Learning Security Top Ten is generated by LLMs and there is a lot of errors in it. For example, the description of member inference attack, and the use of the terms such as "a malicious attacker" (Is there a benign attacker then?).
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: