Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues regarding datawise unlearning #5

Open
AKANKSHASINGH233 opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Issues regarding datawise unlearning #5

AKANKSHASINGH233 opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@AKANKSHASINGH233
Copy link

AKANKSHASINGH233 commented Jan 14, 2025

Hi @ljcc0930 @a-F1 :):)
the command-python main_selmu.py --arch resnet18 --dataset cifar10 --cp_path results/cifar10_resnet/origin/0model_SA_best.pth.tar --select_epochs 2 --num_indexes_to_replace 4500 --unlearn w_retrain --unlearn_steps 2 --theta_lr 1e-3 --save_dir results/cifar10_resnet/data-wise
followed by
python main_evalmu.py --arch resnet18 --dataset cifar10 --cp_path results/cifar10_resnet/origin/0model_SA_best.pth.tar --unlearn retrain --num_indexes_to_replace 4500 --unlearn_steps 182 --theta_lr 0.1 --w_path results/cifar10_resnet/data-wise/select_weight.pth.tar --save_dir results/cifar10_resnet/evaluation
yields UA almost same as RA I tried but i am unable to understand why is it not reducing to 5% as mentioned in the paper ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant