Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IDC] Support reporting of problematic studies - Part 2 - Post report to IDC Discourse. #2006

Closed
JamesAPetts opened this issue Aug 24, 2020 · 11 comments
Labels
IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority v2-legacy OHIF v2

Comments

@JamesAPetts
Copy link
Member

Follow up to #1939

Post report of problematic studies to IDC Discourse.

  • Be able to automatically post a user defined issues/message to the IDC Discourse.
  • Autogenerate screenshots of the application.
@JamesAPetts JamesAPetts added the IDC:priority Items that the Imaging Data Commons wants to help sponsor label Aug 24, 2020
@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Aug 25, 2020

So what would be the workflow for posting to discourse? At what point the user would need to log in? Did you think the process to be fully automatic, or OHIF would pre-populate the post for the user and let them click "submit"?

A simpler approach would be to pre-generate an email text, or send email to support@canceridc.dev. Emails sent to that address will show up on discourse, but in a private category, so we can triage it. Another benefit is that even users who are not registered with discourse can post to that address.

@JamesAPetts
Copy link
Member Author

JamesAPetts commented Aug 27, 2020

For the MVP we will just have a mailto button:

  • This should copy in the debug table to the body if possible.
  • See what useful screenshots we can take.

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Sep 4, 2020

Looks like the following two might fulfill many of the Discourse integration needs!

Maybe just adding a pre-populated Discourse link side by side with the mailto might be sufficient?

@JamesAPetts
Copy link
Member Author

Sure thing, we'll need to do this in the IDC fork though, as its rather use case specific. Once we have closed the other major open tickets we can update the fork and work on it in there.

@JamesAPetts
Copy link
Member Author

The last discourse bit has been pushed to post MVP on the fork.

@fedorov fedorov added IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority and removed IDC:priority Items that the Imaging Data Commons wants to help sponsor labels Jan 14, 2021
@Punzo Punzo added IDC:priority Items that the Imaging Data Commons wants to help sponsor and removed IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority labels Feb 11, 2021
@pieper
Copy link
Member

pieper commented Mar 11, 2021

Does this support Discourse or only Discord?

@igoroctaviano
Copy link
Contributor

Does this support Discourse or only Discord?

Ops... I thought I had read Discord haha 🌝 , I'll revisit the issue and update the findings here.

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Apr 1, 2021

Unless development for this issue is well underway, I suggest de-prioritizing it under idc:candidate for the sake of focusing efforts on other priority tickets.

@pieper pieper added IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority and removed IDC:priority Items that the Imaging Data Commons wants to help sponsor labels Apr 1, 2021
@pieper
Copy link
Member

pieper commented Apr 1, 2021

good idea, done

@igoroctaviano igoroctaviano removed their assignment Apr 21, 2021
@igoroctaviano igoroctaviano added the v2-legacy OHIF v2 label May 30, 2023
@sedghi
Copy link
Member

sedghi commented Oct 12, 2023

@igoroctaviano @fedorov is this valid?

@fedorov
Copy link
Member

fedorov commented Oct 13, 2023

This is IDC-specific and should not be in the OHIF tracker. I think it is here because early on we did not know how to separate such issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IDC:candidate Possible feature requests for discussion, and if we agree, they can be relabeled IDC:priority v2-legacy OHIF v2
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants