Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Events After Death #42

Open
ericaVoss opened this issue Oct 30, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Events After Death #42

ericaVoss opened this issue Oct 30, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@ericaVoss
Copy link
Collaborator

ericaVoss commented Oct 30, 2018

TYPE NOTES
ITEM How do we handle events after death?
FORUM POST TBD
SOLUTION Currently there is a convention very similar to this: Death Convention 2. "...If a patient has clinical activity (e.g. prescriptions filled, labs performed, etc) more than 60+ days after death you may want to drop the death record as it may have been falsely reported. .." However this doesn't specifically address what you do with records that come after a believable death.
NEXT STEPS
  • Move Death Conventions to either CONDITION_OCCURRENCE or PERSON.
  • Add to this convention a statement like,
    If there records after a death that are records that make sense postmortem they can either be kept or removed based on the potential analytic use cases.
We need to also associate how this is related to OBSERVATION_PERIOD
@ericaVoss ericaVoss added this to the Release V2.0.0 milestone Oct 30, 2018
@chandryou
Copy link

In my case, I set death as top priority. So I removed all records after death.

@PRijnbeek
Copy link

Option two is the best. These things can happen for example from autopsy and make sense.
I would definitely not move the Death date!

@cgreich
Copy link
Contributor

cgreich commented Oct 31, 2018

@PRijnbeek: I don't think @ericaVoss means to move the death date. I think she means to apply the convention to Condition and Person, now that we abolished the DEATH table in v6. Is that correct, @ericaVoss? Why "or"?

@PRijnbeek
Copy link

Aah okay yes that makes sense.

@ericaVoss
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Great conversation everyone! This is what THEMIS needs!

  • @chandryou I think that is fine, in a lot of cases it might make sense to get rid of the records. But I can see in other cases they may want to keep them.
  • @PRijnbeek agree, we are not moving the death date! Obviously the statement isn't clear so we can improve that.

Right now THEMIS is just logging what we want to address (THEMIS Progress Steps 1-3). We still have to agree to the THEMIS language, then put it out to the community on the forum for more feedback. So no worries, we aren't going off and making random rules on our own!

@mvanzandt mvanzandt added the Ratified! This issue has been ratified by Themis label Apr 16, 2019
@dimshitc
Copy link

dimshitc commented Aug 19, 2019

We need to also associate how this is related to OBSERVATION_PERIOD

Any thoughts?

@cgreich
Copy link
Contributor

cgreich commented Aug 19, 2019

Same rule as for other Event tables? 60 days post mortem?

@MelaniePhilofsky
Copy link
Collaborator

CDM conventions updated. Closing this issue.

@MelaniePhilofsky
Copy link
Collaborator

This isn't documented in the new Themis convention library. Reopening until the library is updated with this convention.

@MelaniePhilofsky MelaniePhilofsky added Needs documentation and removed Ratified! This issue has been ratified by Themis PRIORITY MEDIUM labels May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Ratified
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants