Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

With proj A depending on proj B - want to pack A with a.dll and b.dll #3893

Closed
harikmenon opened this issue Nov 8, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Functionality:Pack Resolution:Duplicate This issue appears to be a Duplicate of another issue
Milestone

Comments

@harikmenon
Copy link

Details about Problem

NuGet Pack Task

NuGet version 4.0

VS version (if appropriate): VS 15

Detailed repro steps so we can see the same problem

  1. Create a .Net Class Library (A)

  2. Add another .Net Core Class Library (B)

  3. Reference B from A

  4. Set type in ProjectReference to Project

  5. Pack A

Expected
Binaries from B are copied to lib/tfm

Actual
Still treats it as a PackageReference

...

@rrelyea rrelyea changed the title Unable to pack P2P dependencies as Project references With proj A depending on proj B - want to pack A with a.dll and b.dll Dec 8, 2016
@rrelyea rrelyea added this to the Future-1 milestone Dec 8, 2016
@rrelyea
Copy link
Contributor

rrelyea commented Dec 8, 2016

We don't plan to enable this in dotnet pack / msbuild /t:pack in 4.0 timeframe.
We'll listen to customer feedback and consider in the future.

@rohit21agrawal
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as duplicate of : #3891

@kkm000
Copy link

kkm000 commented Jan 31, 2020

@rrelyea, "Focusing on NuGet client software to enable great work by the NuGet community!", wrote not even 3 years past:

We'll listen to customer feedback and consider in the future.

If you want to hear the customer feedback, please go no further than #3891. 3.5 years worth of customer feedback is quite a collection. I must give you a fair warning, though, that the feedback is not exactly positive. I would call it rather agitated.

The biggest problem with the future is that it inevitably comes, but nobody knows exactly when this capricious creature will arrive. "we'll consider it in the future," let me express myself in a straightforward manner, is not a very informative answer. After 3 and a half years it would certainly be quite educating to understand how far, by the planning methodology that the team adopted, "the future" is from now. The only certain things I know about the future is that we will all die and that we'll pay taxes one way or another. Any other concept of "the future" is implicitly operational, and therefore requires a clarification, in my opinion. A rough numeric estimate expressed in time units would be immensely helpful. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Functionality:Pack Resolution:Duplicate This issue appears to be a Duplicate of another issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants