libuv test fail on aarch64-linux and riscv64-linux

[GenericNerdyUsername]

Steps To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. build nixpkgs.libuv when system is aarch64-linux or riscv64-linux (can be tested on x86 nixos by adding boot.binfmt.emulatedSystems = [ "aarch64-linux" "riscv64-linux" ])

Build log

aarch64: https://gist.github.com/GenericNerdyUsername/9640b3df1ab98d1f8cfdb75d7fd01a87
riscv64: https://gist.github.com/GenericNerdyUsername/8f8e5f3389001315f6aae4216a9de183

Notify maintainers

@cstrahan

Metadata

 - system: `"x86_64-linux"`
 - host os: `Linux 5.19.5, NixOS, 22.11 (Raccoon), 22.11.20220901.2da64a8`
 - multi-user?: `yes`
 - sandbox: `yes`
 - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.11.0`
 - channels(root): `"nixos"`
 - nixpkgs: `/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos`

[danielbarter]

Don't think this is an architecture issue. I am seeing exactly the same issue running

nix-build -E 'with import <nixpkgs> { config.replaceStdenv = ({ pkgs }: pkgs.clangStdenv);}; libuv'

system info:

 - system: `"x86_64-linux"`
 - host os: `Linux 5.15.90, NixOS, 22.11 (Raccoon), 22.11.20230204.8e82401`
 - multi-user?: `yes`
 - sandbox: `yes`
 - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.11.1`
 - channels(root): `"nixos-22.11"`
 - nixpkgs: `/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos`

Last few (relevant) log lines:

ok 388 - utf8_decode1_overrun
ok 389 - walk_handles
ok 390 - watcher_cross_stop
ok 391 - we_get_signal
ok 392 - we_get_signal_one_shot
ok 393 - we_get_signals
ok 394 - we_get_signals_mixed
FAIL: test/run-tests
======================================================
1 of 1 test failed
Please report to https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues
======================================================

[winterqt]

This was fixed in #211896, keeping open until -next is merged.

[danielbarter]

Ah great. Thanks @winterqt !

[GenericNerdyUsername]

This was fixed in #211896, keeping open until -next is merged.

Did you mean merged into master or merged into a stable branch?

[Artturin]

https://nixpk.gs/pr-tracker.html?pr=211896 its in nixos-unstable now