Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Atlnts 155 (retuning benthics dec8 20) #79

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2020

Conversation

RGamble1
Copy link
Collaborator

@andybeet, @jcaracappa1
Updates to benthic groups: BC, LOB, RCB, BMS, TWH and SWH
Changes to LOB, RCB, BMS and BC mum, C and E values to try to get the benthic community to persist at reasonable levels.
Decreases to quadratic mortality for TWH and SWH to allow them to persist at higher levels.

Robert Gamble and others added 3 commits December 14, 2020 10:07
Changes to LOB, RCB, BMS and BC mum, C and E values to try to get the benthic community to persist at reasonable levels.

Decreases to quadratic mortality for TWH and SWH to allow them to persist at higher levels.
  Updates to benthic groups: BC, LOB, RCB, BMS, TWH and SWH
  Changes to LOB, RCB, BMS and BC mum, C and E values to try to get the benthic community to persist at reasonable levels.
  Decreases to quadratic mortality for TWH and SWH to allow them to persist at higher levels.
@RGamble1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@andybeet, @jcaracappa1
Not sure exactly why we ended up with a merge conflict, but I suggest we use the values from this new file for the benthic groups (only 1 actually changed, the rest are comment related) and SWH and TWH.

@jcaracappa1
Copy link
Collaborator

@gambler1650 @andybeet I think it's because I had made changes to those in the last pull request?? I agree though. This looks good to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants