Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

choose extra field names #13

Open
cpmpercussion opened this issue Jul 24, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

choose extra field names #13

cpmpercussion opened this issue Jul 24, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@cpmpercussion
Copy link
Contributor

We can add extra fields to the bibtex file for storing links to external material such as videos, code, or posters.

So we should choose a few names and start adding them where videos are available: e.g.,
supplementary-video-url, talk-url, poster-url, code-url..

Then on the proceedings website, I can make a button for each extra field.

@alexarje
Copy link
Contributor

Should we separate between URLs and DOIs, or just put DOIs into URL fields?

@cpmpercussion
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it's fine to have separate URL and doi fields, and to leave the url fields pointing to our archived version of the papers.

btw, I've revised the website to point to Zenodo as much as possible, hopefully that cuts down the bandwidth fees a bit 🙃

@alexarje
Copy link
Contributor

I see that there are currently extra fields for two of the years:

2015: Urlsuppl1
2016: Track

The track one from 2016 is not particularly useful, but the 2015 field should be changed to whatever we choose.

@alexarje
Copy link
Contributor

I have now added links to videos from 2011. Have used Presentation-video as the field name. Can easily be changed to something else, if needed.

@alexarje
Copy link
Contributor

Would it make sense to have a field for the submission type as well? Demo, short paper and long paper?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants