Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0.49.49.1] Contracts don't generate with (proper) pay #4179

Closed
Jenbak5 opened this issue Jun 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

[0.49.49.1] Contracts don't generate with (proper) pay #4179

Jenbak5 opened this issue Jun 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug Outdated Test against current Milestone or the latest Nightly Build

Comments

@Jenbak5
Copy link

Jenbak5 commented Jun 8, 2024

Fill out the fields below with as much pertinent information as possible to help the developers solve the issue.
Search for your issue inside open and closed issues first before reporting so as not to make duplicates.
(Delete the above lines)

Environment

MegaMek Version 0.49.49.1
Windows 10
Java 17.0.11

Description

bugreportcontract
I created a new campaign using the StratCon Alpha as base with some modifications and then generated my company with a single lance.

New contracts don't generate with proper pay (they range from 1 200 to 18 240 C-bills).

Files

Zip file containing:
Bug report - Contract Pay.zip

  • the log file
  • campaign save
  • company generation preset
@SJuliez SJuliez transferred this issue from MegaMek/megamek Jun 8, 2024
@Jenbak5
Copy link
Author

Jenbak5 commented Jun 8, 2024

Coming back to the save much later I found out that my meks had no value attached to them and neither did the spare parts.
So unless the C-bills in the bank also counts for contract pay evaluation I think that might be the cause.
But how that happened; I'm not sure.
image

image

@HammerGS HammerGS added Bug Outdated Test against current Milestone or the latest Nightly Build labels Jun 8, 2024
@HammerGS
Copy link
Member

HammerGS commented Jun 8, 2024

Likely fixed with #4141

@Jenbak5
Copy link
Author

Jenbak5 commented Jun 8, 2024

Yup, got it laid out to me in the discord. I did toggle the "Reverse quality name" during initiation

@Jenbak5 Jenbak5 closed this as completed Jun 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Outdated Test against current Milestone or the latest Nightly Build
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants