Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

raw results #3

Open
kongbia opened this issue Nov 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

raw results #3

kongbia opened this issue Nov 22, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@kongbia
Copy link

kongbia commented Nov 22, 2020

Could you please share the raw results of VOT2018 and LaSOT

@MasterBin-IIAU
Copy link
Owner

@kongbia
Hi, thank you for your interest in our work. We will provide all raw results and complete models after this paper is accepted.

@2006pmach
Copy link

Hi, I am interested in the raw numbers of NFS. In particular, do you know why your numbers for SuperDiMP (Success: 66.9) are more than 2% higher than the once reported by the authors (64.7) https://github.com/visionml/pytracking/blob/master/MODEL_ZOO.md#Raw-Results? I am just curious. Did you do anything different here? Did you use their evaluation protocol? How often did you run the stochastic tracker? I know that the authors of SuperDiMP report on five runs and then average? Could this explain the diff? Anyway, nice work and looking forward to checkout the raw results and the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants