You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I am interested in the raw numbers of NFS. In particular, do you know why your numbers for SuperDiMP (Success: 66.9) are more than 2% higher than the once reported by the authors (64.7) https://github.com/visionml/pytracking/blob/master/MODEL_ZOO.md#Raw-Results? I am just curious. Did you do anything different here? Did you use their evaluation protocol? How often did you run the stochastic tracker? I know that the authors of SuperDiMP report on five runs and then average? Could this explain the diff? Anyway, nice work and looking forward to checkout the raw results and the code.
Could you please share the raw results of VOT2018 and LaSOT
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: