[Discussion]: Should I fix unrecognized manifest key in this project?

[BlackHole1]

Many people in the community are currently experiencing the following error:

(node:22308) ExtensionLoadWarning: Warnings loading extension at xxx:
  Unrecognized manifest key 'browser_action'.
  Unrecognized manifest key 'minimum_chrome_version'.
  Unrecognized manifest key 'short_name'.
  Unrecognized manifest key 'update_url'.
  Permission 'activeTab' is unknown or URL pattern is malformed.
  Cannot load extension with file or directory name _metadata. Filenames starting with "_" are reserved for use by the system.

The reason for this error is due to the combination of chromium and electron

I have submitted a PR for the fix to electron and it has been merged as well, see: electron/electron#29695

However, it is not clear which version of this PR will be carried. electron@v16.x

As a project affected by this issue do much, should we fix it temporarily in the project?

just like this: #177

[BlackHole1]

This is a community project, so I wanted to discuss the feasibility with you all before submitting a PR.

@MarshallOfSound @brunos3d @dewinterjack @agentschmitt

[BlackHole1]

Here's a list of my statistics on encountering this problem:

#197
#182
#149
#143
#141
#165

[twosaturdayscode]

It would be great! Even tho it doesn't block anything it's always annoying to ignore warnings.

[agentschmitt]

i aggree thats annoying to ignore warnings and it seems the fix to electron wilkl be on v16 only so it would be nice to have the fix for devtools too.

[chase]

We're stuck on an older version of Electron for the time being, so I agree with @agentschmitt

I would like to see this merged still: #177

[MarshallOfSound]

Advertising other modules to capitalize off of SEO of an existing module is bad form. Please do not do so, I'd normally let it slide but doing it across multiple issues shows clear intent.

[BlackHole1]

Advertising other modules to capitalize off of SEO of an existing module is bad form. Please do not do so, I'd normally let it slide but doing it across multiple issues shows clear intent.

👌🏻 sorry, I didn't mean to do that. you have a point.

[BlackHole1]

so, may I ask how you feel about this issue? If I could, I wouldn't need to maintain another library.

[BlackHole1]

I would like to know what is the reason why you have not made any comments about #177 and this issue so far?
Because 267 days have passed since I brought this up and you have not made any comments.
Although the project is personal to you and open source itself represents freedom.
Wouldn't it be more polite if you could respond to comments?

I'm not moral coercion, I just have some questions about your long period of non-response.