Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] G30 - Single Z-Probe doesn't respect HOME_AFTER_DEACTIVATE #27206

Open
1 task done
KevWal opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #27229
Open
1 task done

[BUG] G30 - Single Z-Probe doesn't respect HOME_AFTER_DEACTIVATE #27206

KevWal opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #27229

Comments

@KevWal
Copy link

KevWal commented Jun 25, 2024

Did you test the latest bugfix-2.1.x code?

No, but I will test it now!

Bug Description

The command "G30" - Single Z-Probe doesn't appear to respect the HOME_AFTER_DEACTIVATE setting.

I have NO_MOTION_BEFORE_HOMING and HOME_AFTER_DEACTIVATE set in my config file, they work fine normally, enforcing the homing before motion, but then I created some Macros (in Pronterface) using G30 and they just move, even after a deactivation, without a homing.

Bug Timeline

Noticed 24/06/2024

Expected behavior

Expected not to move with an error, or to run a G28 automatically

Actual behavior

It just moves, even if it means it tries to take the axis beyond the maximum limits of the printer (I have no max physical end stops), causing motors to stall and possible damage.

Steps to Reproduce

Deactivate the motors
Run a G30 command

Version of Marlin Firmware

2.1.2.4

Printer model

Prusa I3

Electronics

RAMPS 1.4

LCD/Controller

Panelolu2

Other add-ons

No response

Bed Leveling

ABL Bilinear mesh

Your Slicer

Slic3r

Host Software

Pronterface

Don't forget to include

  • A ZIP file containing your Configuration.h and Configuration_adv.h.

Additional information & file uploads

Configuration.zip

@ellensp
Copy link
Contributor

ellensp commented Jun 26, 2024

Please test the bugfix-2.1.x branch to see where it stands. If the problem has been resolved then we can close this issue. If the issue isn't resolved yet, then we should investigate further.

@thisiskeithb
Copy link
Member

@DerAndere1 opened up a PR that may fix this:

Please give that PR a try and report your findings there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants