Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark RGB++ Info for Signet #700

Closed
Keith-CY opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Mark RGB++ Info for Signet #700

Keith-CY opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Keith-CY
Copy link
Member

This feature request comes from the community

There will be one more BTC testnet, named signet(https://mempool.space/signet) for the RGB++ application because the performance of BTC testnet was impacted.

The following updates are required:

  1. verify the transaction on BTC testnet and BTC signet simultaneously when an RGB++ transaction is synced @rabbitz
  2. deploy one more BTC live UTXO monitor for the signet @Daryl-L
  3. Mark the new cell config in the frontend @Keith-CY

Ref:

@Keith-CY Keith-CY changed the title Mark RGB++ Contract for Signet Mark RGB++ Info for Signet Jun 13, 2024
@Keith-CY Keith-CY moved this to 🆕 New in CKB Explorer Jun 13, 2024
@Keith-CY
Copy link
Member Author

  1. Mark new cell config in the frontend will by updated by nervosnetwork/ckb-explorer-frontend@18f54cb

@Daryl-L
Copy link

Daryl-L commented Jun 13, 2024

bitcoin check service has already been deployed for signet, testnet and the mainnet.

@rabbitz rabbitz moved this from 🆕 New to 📌CurrentWeek in CKB Explorer Jun 14, 2024
@rabbitz
Copy link

rabbitz commented Jun 14, 2024

@rabbitz rabbitz moved this from 📌CurrentWeek to 👀 Testing in CKB Explorer Jun 17, 2024
@FrederLu
Copy link

Testnet verified.

@FrederLu FrederLu moved this from 👀 Testing to 🚩Pre Release in CKB Explorer Jun 24, 2024
@Keith-CY Keith-CY moved this from 🚩Pre Release to ✅ Done in CKB Explorer Jun 25, 2024
@rabbitz rabbitz removed the status in CKB Explorer Aug 4, 2024
@poor-defined poor-defined moved this to ✅ Done in CKB Explorer Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants