[EmmyLua] Mix array-style and dictionary-style tables

[Snakybo]

I'm adding EmmyLua-style documentation throughout my project, and ran into a scenario where I have a table that I use as an array, but also add a key to it:

binding.targets = {}
binding.targets.enabled = enabledState

table.insert(binding.targets, target)
...

In my class definitions, I've added the following:

--- @class Binding
--- @field public targets Target[]
--- @field public targets.enabled boolean

However, this shows up in Intellisense like this:

local binding: Binding {
    ["targets.enabled"]: boolean,
    targets: Target[]
}

Which is incorrect as .enabled is a property of the .targets table rather than a top-level key. Is it possible to define such a structure using the EmmyLua-like annotations? Ideally it would show the .enabled property when using Intellisense on the .targets array when typing:

         [--------------------------]
         [ enabled          boolean ]
         [--------------------------]
binding.targets.

[sumneko]

It seems that EmmyLua does not support mixing