Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.1.0 #1202

Closed
slaweet opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.1.0 #1202

slaweet opened this issue Aug 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@Efefefef

Comments

@slaweet
Copy link
Contributor

slaweet commented Aug 22, 2018 •
edited by faival
Loading

Expected behaviour

Jenkins should run against lisk-core 1.0.1

Actual behaviour

Jenkins runs against lisk-core 1.0.0-rc.1
@slaweet slaweet added the chore label Aug 22, 2018
@faival
Copy link
Contributor

faival commented Aug 29, 2018 •
edited
Loading

being this time, will update requirement to run hub against core 1.0.1

@faival faival changed the title Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.0.0-rc.2 Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.0.1 Aug 29, 2018
@faival faival mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2018
Merged
@slaweet
Copy link
Contributor Author

slaweet commented Oct 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Now latest stable core release is 1.0.3 https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/releases, updating title.
Still stuck on DevOps task https://trello.com/c/DSmC97tg

@slaweet slaweet changed the title Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.0.1 Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.0.3 Oct 15, 2018
@slaweet slaweet changed the title Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.0.3 Update Jenkins to run against lisk-core 1.1.0 Oct 19, 2018
@slaweet
Copy link
Contributor Author

slaweet commented Oct 19, 2018

Updated title to use core 1.1.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Efefefef Efefefef

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@faival @slaweet @Efefefef