You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2024. It is now read-only.
The goal of the Governance module is twofold. The prime motivation is to allow a community to influence the future direction and development of a PoS chain running the module. Currently, there is no natural decentralized way for a team or a project to receive funding support. The Governance module adds a financial incentive to improve the ecosystem while leaving the control in the hands of the public: a funding proposal can authorize a token transfer from the governance treasury. Additionally, the Governance module allows the community to influence the development by democratically voting on any project-related issue: any user can submit a universal proposal. This enables the community to identify important discussion points and bring them to public attention.
The second goal of the Governance module is to alleviate hardforks in case when only modifiable parameters are changed. If a consensus is reached, the stakeholders can change the value of a modifiable parameter without a hardfork. This greatly simplifies tuning sensitive constants, for example tokenomics-related parameters, while putting community in control of the changes.
LIP
Introduce Governance module
Motivation
The goal of the Governance module is twofold. The prime motivation is to allow a community to influence the future direction and development of a PoS chain running the module. Currently, there is no natural decentralized way for a team or a project to receive funding support. The Governance module adds a financial incentive to improve the ecosystem while leaving the control in the hands of the public: a funding proposal can authorize a token transfer from the governance treasury. Additionally, the Governance module allows the community to influence the development by democratically voting on any project-related issue: any user can submit a universal proposal. This enables the community to identify important discussion points and bring them to public attention.
The second goal of the Governance module is to alleviate hardforks in case when only modifiable parameters are changed. If a consensus is reached, the stakeholders can change the value of a modifiable parameter without a hardfork. This greatly simplifies tuning sensitive constants, for example tokenomics-related parameters, while putting community in control of the changes.
Tasks
Sprint 103
Sprint 104
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: