Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question/suggestion: units training data #1649

Closed
mm12 opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Question/suggestion: units training data #1649

mm12 opened this issue Feb 16, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mm12
Copy link

mm12 commented Feb 16, 2023

When doing math, there should be an integration of unit conversion, similar to when using the calculator in Google's omnibox (for example, type (500mA) * (1Ω) into the chrome url bar, it converts to volts). #595 would partially do this, but I have found wolfram often doesn't understand what is a variable and a unit, and what unit it is (ie, instead of Amperes, it guesses acres). I'm not sure if other Wolfram products (like compute or mathematica) would solve this, and even Google's calculator has faults (doesn't like imaginary numbers, kiloOhms (kΩ), µA, etc, unless you type it out).

One way this could be solved is by trying to extract any units and computing them separately.

@andreaskoepf
Copy link
Collaborator

What you suggest touches a more fundamental problem: How to properly add math capabilities to a LLM? While there is ongoing research on generalization and algorithmic capabilities of LLMs and even some hope to solve it just by scaling up a practical approach (less interesting for AI researchers) could be to give "actions" (e.g. special tokens) to the LLMs to use existing math tools for computations.

@LAION-AI LAION-AI locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 14, 2023
@andreaskoepf andreaskoepf converted this issue into discussion #3447 Jun 14, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants