-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GSoC 2017: Middlewares for common web application chores in Mux.jl #41
Comments
Following are the functionalities that I think are required. But it would be really nice if others can review it and give some inputs.
For session and secure session (3rd point), I am taking inspiration from WSGI's Beaker
Functionalities
Functionalities
Next two points, I am still figuring out. Any pointers for inspiration would be great.
|
Hey Sarvjeet, sorry for not getting back earlier on this. This looks like a good list of functionality. I'll try to review your PRs over the next couple of days. |
I like your work so far. Can you submit a proposal? Would like to see some thoughts on HTTP.jl, as well as what you'd use as a test case. Perhaps a reimplementation of juliaobserver.com in julia? |
@MikeInnes I have submitted a proposal, just now. Please take a look at it. My display name is Sarvjeet Ghotra. Will get back to you soon, after some investigation on it.
Could you please elaborate it a little bit ?
|
Will take a look. I think it'd be good to build a small web app as a test case, (a) to prioritise features from the list you have above, and (b) to show off and document what Mux can do. So that's one idea. Up to you if you have alternative ideas on how to do those things, of course. |
So, I've spent a (small) bit of time trying to get at least a few of these
Handled by nested
Is this necessary? Just adding another middleware "below" a stack of
To be implemented
Handled by
See MuxMiddleware
WIP from #39
Handled by
To be implemented; I think this should go in its own package, like
This might also be its own package (along with other "meta" functionality); my
Definitely should be in its own package(s); authentication mechanisms are a And here are some of my own ideas that I might implement eventually (not to be
|
I am opening this issue just to discuss the matter related to the above mentioned project. I am an aspirant to participate in GSoC 2017 with this project.
I have made couple of pull requests, can someone please take a look at them.
@MikeInnes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: