possible test failure (again!) in upcoming Julia version 1.5

[rfourquet]

A PkgEval run for a Julia pull request which changes the generated numbers for rand(a:b) indicates that the tests of this package might fail in Julia 1.5 (and on Julia current master branch).

Also, you might be interested in using the new StableRNGs.jl registered package, which provides guaranteed stable streams of random numbers across Julia releases.

Apologies if this is a false positive. Cf. https://github.com/JuliaCI/NanosoldierReports/blob/ab6676206b210325500b4f4619fa711f2d7429d2/pkgeval/by_hash/52c2272_vs_47c55db/logs/MLJBase/1.5.0-DEV-87d2a04de3.log

[tlienart]

@ablaom In the context of #292 I ran the test suite on 1.5 without issue but I would still think that using StableRNG in the testss would be great to avoid future potential headaches?

I'm going to shift to it in MLJLinearModels

[ablaom]

Sounds like a good idea. I did not know there was a multi-julia version fix for this, so thanks for pointing it out.