You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, members can only be controlled by externally owned members, this is fine, but if we had a smart contracting environment, then smart contracts could control members, meaning they could run for council, make channels, issue tokens etc. This opens the way for DAOs and various forms of collectives and external chains to
Propoposal
Introduce EVM pallet and allow contracts to own memberships, meaning that they can do whatever the owned member can do. This will be a complex change, so this issue is only meant to capture the idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background
Currently, members can only be controlled by externally owned members, this is fine, but if we had a smart contracting environment, then smart contracts could control members, meaning they could run for council, make channels, issue tokens etc. This opens the way for DAOs and various forms of collectives and external chains to
Propoposal
Introduce EVM pallet and allow contracts to own memberships, meaning that they can do whatever the owned member can do. This will be a complex change, so this issue is only meant to capture the idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: