Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get rid of the gstreamer-0.10 dependency #2

Closed
abendebury opened this issue Dec 11, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

get rid of the gstreamer-0.10 dependency #2

abendebury opened this issue Dec 11, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Feature New feature
Milestone

Comments

@abendebury
Copy link

abendebury commented Dec 11, 2015

No description provided.

@abendebury abendebury modified the milestone: 2.0 Dec 13, 2015
@JoeLametta
Copy link
Collaborator

Ongoing discussion about this one can be found here: thomasvs/morituri#47
User alexvong1995 said he will try to work on this one during the holidays.

@abendebury
Copy link
Author

That's good, considering that I don't have much experience with gstreamer. It's not too high of a priority since it works currently and not a blocker for being an approved ripper.

@xmixahlx
Copy link

Is there any update?

Resolving the gstreamer 0.10 situation seems incredibly important from a packaging perspective (Debian!).

I've been able to sidestep the issue on Debian Unstable by checking out the sources from Jessie, some packaging modifications and build-deps (updated libraries, etc.), and rebuilding the gst-plugins-good package (I just rebuilt all of them...).

Whipper is working great on Debian Unstable now. Thanks!

@JoeLametta
Copy link
Collaborator

If I recall correctly this was being worked on (finished?) by @MerlijnWajer for another project and it results in a complete overhaul to the codebase.
It still needs to be rebased for whipper but hopefully it shouldn't take too long.

In the next days I won't be able to reply. For any questions regarding this one, please ask @RecursiveForest

@JoeLametta
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussion about this one will continue on issue #29.

JoeLametta added a commit that referenced this issue May 31, 2017
Second round of improvements suggested by Freso.
@JoeLametta JoeLametta modified the milestones: 2.0, 1.0 Nov 12, 2018
@JoeLametta JoeLametta added Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Feature New feature and removed enhancement labels Nov 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Feature New feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants