Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T265- getting pose and fisheye frame #5829

Closed
galikrosentalik opened this issue Feb 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

T265- getting pose and fisheye frame #5829

galikrosentalik opened this issue Feb 11, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@galikrosentalik
Copy link

Required Info
Camera Model T265
Firmware Version 0.2.0.926
Operating System & Version Linux (Ubuntu 18)
Kernel Version 4.15.0-54-generic
Platform PC
SDK Version 2.32.1
Language C++
Segment Robot

Issue Description

Hey all,
my system is multi cam system, same process, but different threads is handling both D435/415 and T265.
The system needs to work with more then one of a kind, currently 2 * T265 and 1 * D4X5.
When getting from the T265 only positioning, the system works fine.
We need to expend our system so the T265 will generate in addition to pose data also the fish-eye frames.
Our current flow does not use callback methods, but the pipe.poll_for_frames.
When enabling also the fish-eye stream we are not able to keep with the same needed FPS for the positioning, the FPS got lower to 30.
I tried to change the flow to work like your example pos-and-image. when working with single T265 camera everything works fine, but when trying to integrate it in multi-cam system the callback just stooped been called.
are you familiar with the issue of integrating multi-cam and pose-and-image?

@galikrosentalik
Copy link
Author

???

@RealSenseCustomerSupport
Copy link
Collaborator


Hi @galikrosentalik

We understand there are issues with multi cam scenario.

Read through this thread: #5614

Also a PR that can also help: #5645

@galikrosentalik
Copy link
Author

I read the other threads comment.
I did not understand how this issue is related to mine, do you think the last pull request approved by dorodnic suppose to solve my as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants