Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent interface in InfiniTime 1.4.0 #651

Closed
ajack2001my opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #720
Closed

Inconsistent interface in InfiniTime 1.4.0 #651

ajack2001my opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #720
Labels
enhancement Enhancement to an existing app/feature

Comments

@ajack2001my
Copy link

In most components of the watch, a simple slide down will bring the watch to the previous screen. However, the MUSIC and the TORCHLIGHT app does not behave that way.

@ajack2001my
Copy link
Author

The games PONG and 2048 as well as the timer (pacing) app does not conform to the slide down as well.

@Riksu9000
Copy link
Contributor

Most of these apps use the gesture for something else or the closing gesture is disabled so the app won't be accidentally closed. Flashlight could be fixed and Music could possibly be redesigned to not use vertical swipes.

@hubmartin
Copy link
Contributor

I also found no use to swipe in torch to "turn it off". I would prefer to close it.

@Itai-Nelken
Copy link
Contributor

I think the torch should return to the quick settings menu when closed.

@kennysc
Copy link

kennysc commented Sep 10, 2021

I think the torch should return to the quick settings menu when closed.

I agree, it would seem more logical this way.

@Avamander Avamander changed the title [BUG] Inconsistant interface in InfiniTime 1.4.0 Inconsistent interface in InfiniTime 1.4.0 Oct 2, 2021
@Avamander Avamander added the enhancement Enhancement to an existing app/feature label Oct 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement to an existing app/feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants